
Check out part 2 over here..
January 6, 2010 at 1:34 pm
12 – A Film About The Fret Click
February 3rd, 2010
Venster 4 / 14:45 (Made in Rotterdam 7)
International Film Festival Rotterdam 2010
January 4, 2010 at 5:56 pm

Meet the Maestro
DVD design (HuMobisten, 2008 / 2009)
client: Int. Film Festival R’dam & Kunstgebouw
March 2009
We finally picked up the dvd-box (which we finished in March) at the IFFR office, hihi..
November 12, 2009 at 7:53 pm

I always thought the film Turks Fruit (Turkish Delight – Paul Verhoeven, 1973) wasn’t all that! This of course could never been said out loud in certain company. De Vierde Man (The Fourth Man, 1983) is another one of those films that really didn’t quite do it for me. Soldaat van Oranje (Soldier of Orange, 1977) on the other hand is one of my alltime favorites and therefore a film I can quote from in multiple situations. (both Rutger Hauer and Jeroen Krabbé in a Dutch W.W.II epic underground resistance drama). Other mentionable Paul Verhoeven films are made in his Hollywood days and include classics such as Robocop (’87, – I saw a piece of it on TV the other day and it must have a scene I had never given that much attention when I was young, but which actually was quite beautiful. Furthermore I think its cult value is pretty strongly underlined -), Total Recall (’90, when Art School kids around me still thought they had to be like Joseph Beuys, guys like Paul Verhoeven and Oliver Stone (because of Wild Palms) were slowly making me see the light.), Basic Instinct (’92, that film’s so fucking great I’m not even going to explain why) and Starship Troopers (’97) about which I will only say this: Hell yeah!
Now my ‘oldest’ friend Vincent van D. gave me this book ‘Jezus van Nazaret’ (Jesus of Nazaret) by the great Paul Verhoeven for my birthday last year and took me to see the man debating with a handful of theologists and preachers in the Remonstrantse Kerk (of which I have told earlier on this blog) and it was just great to see how friendly everyone was, still a bit sceptic but pretty open minded and not at all judgemental. Now this last august I went on holidays and —finally—read the thing and it’s ace!
Now if you, like me, don’t need all the magic and hocus pocus to be all for a beautiful Godly kingdom and have always been looking for a truthful, human Jesus ‘Christ’ of Nazareth, this is your kind of book. Apart from making fucktastic films, Verhoeven was the sole non theologist allowed in the so called Jesus Seminar, a highly respected think tank of around seventy theologists, linguists and bible experts led by one Robert Funk (!), whose main aim was to free the historical figure Jesus of N. from the mythological biblical hero. Or, as Verhoeven likes to call it, free the bible from biblical-political spin added in (mainly) the years just after Jesus’ death by amongst many others Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. It’s fun to read how Verhoeven uses nothing but common sense (combined with a whole lot of knowledge of the sacred book, which he first gained as an adolescent intrigued by all kinds of forms of the supernatural) and is sort of a Hercule Poirot, or Lieutenant Columbo in search of the truth behind two thousand years of people taking a run with ancient texts. What is even more important is that once Paul has stripped the New Testament of its lies, slanter and ludicrous magical mumbo jumbo it leaves him with first a pretty exciting book on an underground revolutionary running from large scale opression and second the image of a man/god who is mostly nothing but pure love. A loving ‘god’ supporting a loving message. Not too bad for a religious book now is it?
Especially when you’re brought up in a slightly christian fashion and never knew where to exactly put your mixed feelings on the whole ‘godly’ aspect of Christianity (good – evil, guilt – forgiveness, love – hate, life – death), this is one hell of a read! Peter de K., I just KNOW you’re going to love this!!!
September 29, 2009 at 5:20 pm
The temptation of Victoria video by Michael Shamberg.
Videostill (by Geert Mul) of Michael Shamberg (on the right) and me (on the left) in 1999 (Madrid). (Now it is more me on the right, hehe…)
March 30, 2009 at 7:49 pm

I’ve written of my love for war in films earlier on this site so I won’t now, but there’s something I’d like to share with you all simply because I write on this blog and writing them little posts is basically what a blogholder does. Anyway, I’m (finally) watching Band of Brothers (2001). Sander who has interned here has the complete series on DVD and I tricked him into lending it to me. Now in this series one Neil McDonough stars as 1st lieutenant Buck Compton ‘a hell of a combat leader’. I don’t know if it’s because of the brothers dug in deep in their foxholes in the Belgian Ardennes or because of something else, but the acting of this (actually not a very) young man gets me aroused in a non sexual manner. I haven’t seen acting the way he does it in a long time. It reminds me of Newman in Cat on A Hot Tin Roof, Cassavetes in Rosemary’s Baby and most of all of Brando in… well practically everything he was in. It’s the sort of theatrical acting that’s in a way theatrical, yet it isn’t at all. You know what I mean? It’s actually pretty close to ‘the real thing’, but it isn’t, it’s more beautiful… or more driven, more radical than actual human behaviour, but by believing it, it’s like saying you belive in a more radical, a more outspoken human race. I don’t know if this is a good or a bad thing now, but I guess it’s kind of ‘out of fashion’ to act like that nowadays.
When checking his IMDb status my notion on that type of acting got confirmed. To my surpise, Neil mainly works for TV in series such as ‘Martial Law’, ‘Profiler’ or ‘Diagnosis Murder’, he was the voice of Dr. Bruce Banner in the animated series ‘The Incredible Hulk’, lieutenant Hawk in ‘Star trek: First Contact’, and in a most recent performance Neil portrayes Dave Williams in Desperate Housewives, a show I saw only once and will never see again. Hopefully Neil McDonough will be starring in more ‘serious’ roles soon. I could imagine him and Philip Seymour H. in a sort of Thelma and Louise with guys kinda flick, now that would be something. Hey casting agents, are you paying attention?!?
October 24, 2008 at 2:46 pm

Not last night but the night before a certain girlfriend who manages to force me into occasionally watching interesting stuff on tv (like the news or a well made documentary) instead of the junk I prefer, took a look at my tv guide and highlighted this documentary called Boogie Man: The Lee Atwater Story. Although it was on only pretty late, we somehow managed to fight off sleep and stayed up until the midnight hour, around which our carefully selected show started. When it had finally started, we were instantly ‘grabbed’ by it. Apalled and fascinated simultaneously.
This guy, this Lee Atwater, somehow managed to be the perfect guy for the most horrific job in the world, namely: be the republican party’s spin doctor for presidential campaigning and forced both Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush into being presidents by pretty much inventing the word ‘slander campaign’. Now I don’t know how you guys feel about the international influence those two, or should I say three, presidents had on the world as a whole, but I feel it’s safe to say this guy Atwater pretty much personifies the saying ‘the devil’s advocate’.
Lee must have been a real devil, a real ruthless, cynical, natural born machiavellist. But the weirdest and saddest of all is, he was pretty cool. He was funny, a great guitar player (He briefly played backup guitar for Percy Sledge during the 1960s and frequently played with bluesmen such as B.B. King) and his cynicism also worked truth provocing. When asked by a reporter about his unscrupulous methods, he simply stated ‘we never tell how me make sausages’. It’s exciting to see this guy change from the guy you love to hate into the guy you hate to love in only 86 minutes.
He was really a whole lot like Alex Keaton (Michael J. Fox), the only republican family member in the left wing, baby boomer, post hippie Keaton family in the tv series Family Ties. We all know that if power is dominated by an extreme, rebellion will be dominated by the counterpoint of this extreme, meaning ‘when the parents are hippies, their son is a huge fan of William F. Buckley Jr.’ Atwater, being rased in the South, grew a natural anti-establishment feel from the inferiority complex the south had obviously always suffered from (in their minds the South had lost the civil war from jewish New York stock brokers who basically had nothing to do with the country God had in mind for them gunslinging American good ol’ boys), plus he experienced a tragic death in the family which, according to the documentary, caused him to lose faith in god and happiness.
In short the absence of love in this man’s life caused him to have a bizarre understanding of the words ‘responsibility’ and ‘compassion’. So the lack of understanding of those two words in the life of one individual, one genius strategist, has proven tremendously important for the recent history of the US, and the now of the world. Nowadays that’s being called ‘one man can make a defference’. Finally, in the end of the documentary, Atwaters last years of his life might be best be defined as ‘Lee experiencing the wrath of God’. I don’t know, but I was like ‘no matter how bad your judgement is, you just gotta know when you’re really making a big fucking mess’, ‘What goes up must come down’, ‘what goes around…’ and so on. A must see on both political and humane level.